Timber production

"Small-scale" forestry in Wisconsin

Continued forest parcelization creates significant barriers to forest landowners seeking to manage their forests for ecological and economic benefit. Such parcelization also hampers the ability of public agencies to provide technical assistance and education to landowners. In this research and extension project, we define and categorize small-scale forest ownerships through an analysis of practice data.

Younger generations not interested in timber (Green Bay Press Gazette)

On July 6, The Green Bay Press Gazette had an article on the next generation of woods- and mill workers and industry forester (or lack thereof). The article is at this link.

 

Among those quoted was my colleague, Scott Bowe.

The vanishing middle-skilled job sector (WI State Jounal)

In this morning's Wisconsin State Journal, the regular UWEX feature, "Econ Quiz", reported on 2013 study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City on the "middle-skilled job sector." Between 1983 and 2012, the number of jobs classified as middle-skilled nationwide dropped from 59% to 45%.

Blogging Logging 12 - Timber products and buyers

Wisconsin’s logging businesses produce a diverse array of forest products, but hardwood pulp has been the largest portion of the volume harvested: 44% in 2003 and 49% in 2010.  This dominance reflects continued demand from the region’s substantial pulp and paper industry and an abundant hardwood forest resource.  Though Perry (2011) indicated a negative percent change in the volume of aspen on forestland from 2005 to 2010, one of the primary species utilized in the pulp and paper industry.  Softwood pulp accounted for around a quarter of volume removed from the la

Blogging Logging 11 - Source of timber supply

Various landownership categories contribute to the state’s timber supply. Where a logging business is located has a big impact on which types of lands they harvest from. However, other factors also figure into the decision, including the different expectations that landowners have for loggers (e.g., certified land can have more requirements, but fill an important market niche). In reporting the landownership categories from which loggers harvest timber, we weight all findings by their volume harvested in 2003 and 2010 (as appropriate).

Blogging Logging 10 - Timber sales

The number and size of timber sales are important measures for understanding both the economics of logging and the effects of harvesting on ecological outcomes such as fragmentation. Economically, smaller timber sales result in higher costs as loggers must move equipment more frequently and spend more time on procuring timber. Ecologically, harvesting operations create new “patches” in the landscape that will have a different age and habitat characteristics compared to the surrounding forests.

Wisconsin logger study results: comparing then and now

Loggers are the critical link between forests and wood markets. They are also key actors in implementing sustainable forestry. Their actions drive a multi-billion dollar industry that is the backbone of local communities across Wisconsin. The economic downturn has been tough on markets and mills. At the same time, costs continue to rise for equipment, stumpage, and just about everything else. Loggers across the state and nation have felt this trend. Wisconsin’s logging sector entered the recession under considerable strain.

Wisconsin forestry tops nation in jobs and shipments

Click here for press release from Governor's office.

This is an old press release (August), but one I had trouble finding initially. Luckily, the DNR posted it as part of their Wisconsin Forestry Notes, distributed by e-mail. (See here for subscription information.)

I've looked on AF&PA's website for the report with the data, but have not found it. 

Timber harvesting resources for landowners

Harvester; photo by M. RickenbachConsidering a timber sale? Don't know where to start? Here are some resources for you to consider.

 

Publications

MFL: local tax shifts from new enrollments

State Capitol; photo by 'Pauliefred' from WikimediaThe current version of the MFL changes moving through the legislature (SB161) would both (1) increase the amount landowner would pay to close land under the MFL and (2) shift which government units ultimately receive those closed area fees.

Syndicate content
Drupal 6 Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux